Added 313 to PyPi publish

[raphaelshirley]

Closes #215

We need to extend testing to match built versions.

Code Quality

• I have read the Contribution Guide
• My code follows the code style of this project
• My code builds (or compiles) cleanly without any errors or warnings
• My code contains relevant comments and necessary documentation

Project-Specific Pull Request Checklists

Bug Fix Checklist

• My fix includes a new test that breaks as a result of the bug (if possible)
• My change includes a breaking change
  • My change includes backwards compatibility and deprecation warnings (if possible)

New Feature Checklist

• I have added or updated the docstrings associated with my feature using the NumPy docstring format
• I have updated the tutorial to highlight my new feature (if appropriate)
• I have added unit/End-to-End (E2E) test cases to cover my new feature
• My change includes a breaking change
  • My change includes backwards compatibility and deprecation warnings (if possible)

Documentation Change Checklist

• Any updated docstrings use the NumPy docstring format

Build/CI Change Checklist

• If required or optional dependencies have changed (including version numbers), I have updated the README to reflect this
• If this is a new CI setup, I have added the associated badge to the README

Other Change Checklist

• Any new or updated docstrings use the NumPy docstring format.
• I have updated the tutorial to highlight my new feature (if appropriate)
• I have added unit/End-to-End (E2E) test cases to cover any changes
• My change includes a breaking change
  • My change includes backwards compatibility and deprecation warnings (if possible)

[raphaelshirley]

Strange the c++ code coverage is now failing on the 3.10 test.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 66.40%. Comparing base (ee3a99c) to head (0123193).
Report is 7 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #218      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   66.65%   66.40%   -0.25%     
==========================================
  Files          50       50              
  Lines        6229     6225       -4     
  Branches      937      941       +4     
==========================================
- Hits         4152     4134      -18     
- Misses       2077     2091      +14     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[raphaelshirley]

@johannct What do you think? It is passing all the tests after I changed one data retrieval test to acomodate Python 3.13. I also added a line to the lcov command to fix the issue that appeared out of nowhere. Finally I added recursive to the sdist commands but I think we'll have to publish to PyPI tp see if that has worked.

[johannct]

ok let's give it a spin. We should try to be a bit more verbose in the commit comments, so that the review is easier. Here I do not know what exactly was the test failure mode with py3.13 nor what the new lcov options are supposed to mean. Comments are a way to share information and gained knowledge.

[johannct]

please merge and publish as 0.12. But we wont be able to test as now binaries are going to be available with py3.13

[raphaelshirley]

You can force from source https://pip.pypa.io/en/latest/cli/pip_install/#install-no-binary

[raphaelshirley]

I will add more commit comments going forward

[johannct]

You can force from source https://pip.pypa.io/en/latest/cli/pip_install/#install-no-binary

oh right, good catch

[raphaelshirley]

@johan I need an approving review to merge.

[raphaelshirley]

Ah you already did...