Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

DM-46357: Add calibration pipelines for new IsrTaskLSST for LSSTComCam and LSSTComCamSim #274

Merged
merged 29 commits into from
Oct 14, 2024

Conversation

erykoff
Copy link
Contributor

@erykoff erykoff commented Oct 2, 2024

No description provided.

@erykoff erykoff requested a review from czwa October 2, 2024 22:59
Copy link
Contributor

@czwa czwa left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think these are just questions for my own understanding.

cpMeasureBiasDefects:
class: lsst.cp.pipe.MeasureDefectsCombinedTask
config:
badPixelsToFillColumnThreshold: 1000
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Do we expect these config options (for all three tasks) to differ between the three cameras?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I have left them the same for now, because of cargo culting. But I could see these being different for LSSTCam based on defect research.

instrument: lsst.obs.lsst.LsstComCamSim
imports:
- location: $CP_PIPE_DIR/pipelines/_ingredients/cpDefects.yaml
- location: $CP_PIPE_DIR/pipelines/_ingredients/cpDefectsLSST.yaml
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Have we ever run this on LSSTComCamSim data?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

No, actually. I was asked to leave it in just in case ComCamSim adds defects in the future. But I actually think that it is more likely we will just use the existing defects and apply them and not "find" them so this may not be necessary. But wanted to leave the option open.

@erykoff erykoff merged commit 4e3bc6f into main Oct 14, 2024
2 checks passed
@erykoff erykoff deleted the tickets/DM-46357 branch October 14, 2024 22:28
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants