Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add mc-sgx-core-build crate #26

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jul 21, 2022
Merged

Conversation

nick-mobilecoin
Copy link
Collaborator

Add the mc-sgx-core-build crate to hold common build utilities used
with other SGX crates.

@remoun remoun requested a review from a team July 15, 2022 21:40
@nick-mobilecoin nick-mobilecoin force-pushed the feature/common_build_crate branch from bc4ee90 to 136bec0 Compare July 15, 2022 22:48
@jcape jcape requested review from jcape and removed request for a team July 18, 2022 17:27
@nick-mobilecoin nick-mobilecoin force-pushed the feature/common_build_crate branch from 136bec0 to 85cf180 Compare July 20, 2022 20:17
nick-mobilecoin and others added 3 commits July 20, 2022 14:09
Add the `mc-sgx-core-build` crate to hold common build utilities used
with other SGX crates.
Copy link
Contributor

@awygle awygle left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Base automatically changed from feature/trts to develop July 21, 2022 18:20
@nick-mobilecoin
Copy link
Collaborator Author

nick-mobilecoin commented Jul 21, 2022

Graphite Merge Job

Current status: ✅ Merged

This pull request was successfully merged as part of a stack.

This comment was auto-generated by Graphite.

Job Reference: QB8STOU63qtQFHJyhfrd

@nick-mobilecoin nick-mobilecoin merged commit 86edb63 into develop Jul 21, 2022
@nick-mobilecoin nick-mobilecoin deleted the feature/common_build_crate branch July 21, 2022 18:25
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Archived in project
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants