Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: show whether the property is static #190

Merged

Conversation

bendera
Copy link
Contributor

@bendera bendera commented Oct 21, 2023

This PR implements the feature described in #151

@netlify
Copy link

netlify bot commented Oct 21, 2023

Deploy Preview for api-viewer ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit ff2e387
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/api-viewer/deploys/6544ad8def6ff70007e18cef
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-190--api-viewer.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

Copy link
Member

@bennypowers bennypowers left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This looks really good. I'd like it to be more obvious that a property is static, rather than adding the word static to the "type" column.

WDYT @web-padawan

packages/api-docs/src/layout.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@bendera bendera force-pushed the feat/issue-151-static-properties branch from 2118fa8 to 6d79886 Compare October 21, 2023 20:27
Copy link
Member

@bennypowers bennypowers left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Copy link
Member

@bennypowers bennypowers left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please add a changeset

@bendera
Copy link
Contributor Author

bendera commented Oct 22, 2023

Sorry, I'm a bit confused. Who is the comment addressed to? Me or web-padavan? In the first case, which options should I choose? Include all packages + patch bump?

@bennypowers
Copy link
Member

it's a minor changeset on api-docs

@bendera
Copy link
Contributor Author

bendera commented Oct 22, 2023

Done. I included the common package too because new theme variables were added.

@web-padawan web-padawan merged commit 5f7183f into open-wc:master Nov 3, 2023
5 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants