Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Alerting 2.10] Excluding flaky tests #886

Merged

Conversation

amsiglan
Copy link
Contributor

Description

Excluding flaky tests for composite monitors

Issues Resolved

opensearch-project/alerting-dashboards-plugin#737

Check List

  • Commits are signed per the DCO using --signoff

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.
For more information on following Developer Certificate of Origin and signing off your commits, please check here.

Signed-off-by: Amardeepsingh Siglani <[email protected]>
@@ -66,7 +66,7 @@ describe('CompositeLevelMonitor', () => {
});
});

it('by visual editor', () => {
xit('by visual editor', () => {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

does x work? shouldn't be it.skip?

can also do something similar and conditional run these tests if its only flaky on with-security. Then can still verify on without-security

regardless, if you can make a follow up issue that would be great. thank you

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes x also works on excluding these tests. Given that these tests are passing locally, and we are nearing the 2.10 deadline, I'm okay with excluding them from the CI pipeline run

Copy link
Member

@kavilla kavilla left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Checked yes it skipping locally.

@kavilla kavilla merged commit ab793f8 into opensearch-project:2.10 Sep 20, 2023
31 of 32 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants