Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
docs(accessibility-testing): Updates content as part of content audit. #3776
docs(accessibility-testing): Updates content as part of content audit. #3776
Changes from 1 commit
ea7b05e
a843b8a
685182d
f116521
3c10385
51d3a16
2003d3e
cd89723
29d4753
a144112
c212ec5
643b38b
fcc4cff
bcd2f3e
8e4edbf
3f86f36
06e99f0
83b658a
16d508d
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This could be a great followup at some point to add illustrations (definitely out of scope here, just thinking out loud 😆 )
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I noticed that we removed the section on screen reader specific considerations. Do you think the information was redundant or not helpful? Perhaps we could take some of this information and put it underneath the screen reader section above to retain some of it? Curious of your thoughts on this one.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Realizing as I continued reviewing that this was added to the development section. I have mixed feelings. I remember adding it so that users understood how things differed in a screen reader for testing, but I totally get that this also affects developing. @thatblindgeye what do you think? I'm worried that being closer to the content/writing it, I might not be able to see it as objectively. 😂
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah that's tough because it can probably fit in either place. I feel like the content as it is probably fits closer in the development page. I guess it also depends if someone would be going through these pages in order or just what page interests them. I may have a clearer idea once I finish going through the current PRs but wondering whether linking to the development page would make sense? Sort of to convey "Also make sure you're testing stuff we mentioned on this page" or something, if that makes sense.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah, that would make sense to me! I think after reviewing them a second time, I agree that that screen reader content probably makes more sense in the development section.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm not really sure what they could be updated to, but I feel like one or both of the headings for these sections of checklists could be updated from "General criteria" and "Accessibility points". Maybe just this section, as the entire page is regarding accessibility points technically?
Also not sure whether the current/previous content here still fits or if it's either duplicate from the "general criteria" or needs a little more information. The "Links" item in the Structure section, for example, I'm not sure of the purpose there since we mention them again in the Labels section. @jessiehuff wdyt?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I agree on this! I can't immediately tell the difference between the lists, which pushes me towards a heading change or combining the two lists. But I'm not entirely sure what the common thread between the "accessibility points" section is, so I'm not sure how to go about renaming
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Definitely open to different names! My original intention was that the first section was thinking about the different ways of checking things (i.e. screen reader and it's different ways of navigating and keyboard) and that essentially everything should work through each of the general a11y questions and thinking big picture (i.e. just like the questions asked in the development section - is it discoverable, able to be interacted with, and understandable). The second section was more getting into the nitty gritty of checking specific things, starting from high level like structure to more granular things like labels. So totally open to anything that communicates that better! If both of you were confused, it definitely sounds like something should be changed!
In terms of the links in both the structure and labels section, that's because when I'm testing structure, especially using the rotor menu, I check each of those major elements (headings, landmarks, links, form controls, tables) and make sure that nothing immediately looks off with the way that they're handled. That's probably not totally clear though. 🙃 I guess that's what happens when a checklist starts off as more of something for your personal use to trying to communicate it more publicly haha.