Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
While testing the new v-trap implementation from #200 I noticed that upon trapping a vectored interrupt, the program counter ends up halfway between instructions right before
_start_DefaultHandler_trap
causing an illegal instruction exception.The cause seems to be that this location (
_start_DefaultHandler_trap
) is reached via direct unconditional jump in_continue_interrupt_trap
and the jump instruction is taken at 4-byte alignment. Setting these symbols to .align 4 fixes the problem on our (custom) machine.I think it's a feature of RISC-V unconditional jumps that they can't express addresses below 4-byte alignment but it could be a feature(bug) of our machine as well. I'm a bit confused about this still because the disassembly shows the correct target
j 119a <_start_DefaultHandler_trap>
while the machine ends up jumping to1198
and failing.