-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 33
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Populate 'sample_public_name' column values with 'sanger_sample_id' column values for RVI-prefixed samples #4565
Conversation
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## develop #4565 +/- ##
===========================================
+ Coverage 89.25% 89.29% +0.03%
===========================================
Files 1406 1406
Lines 30007 30007
===========================================
+ Hits 26783 26795 +12
+ Misses 3224 3212 -12 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm not as familiar with the data and linkages, but from a rails point of view this looks fine.
Would you please update the PR title to be more human readable?
I updated the title, thanks |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Do you think that this is more suitable to be a Rake task than a migration?
It does not involve any schema updates, and it only has data updates.
I agree. I initially created it as a Rake task, but later I discovered that the data was being updated/populated through a migration. So, I updated it to follow the convention of doing things. |
No description provided.