feat(consensus): add sequencing crates to some CI flows

[matan-starkware]

This change is 

[matan-starkware]

• feat(consensus): add Vote message to proto #2131
• feat(consensus): add milestone 2 state machine #2126
• feat(consensus): consensus should only register with the network if it will run #2152
• feat(consensus): add README to help running milestone 1 #2141
• feat(consensus): add sequencing crates to some CI flows #2134 👈
• feat(consensus): add tracing instrumentation and logging to consensus #2138
• main

This stack of pull requests is managed by Graphite. Learn more about stacking.

Join @matan-starkware and the rest of your teammates on Graphite

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 65.97%. Comparing base (10ceb2a) to head (1726a9e).

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #2134      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   65.93%   65.97%   +0.04%     
==========================================
  Files         135      135              
  Lines       17793    17793              
  Branches    17793    17793              
==========================================
+ Hits        11731    11739       +8     
+ Misses       4779     4769      -10     
- Partials     1283     1285       +2     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[dan-starkware]

Reviewed 1 of 1 files at r1, 1 of 1 files at r3, all commit messages.
Reviewable status: complete! all files reviewed, all discussions resolved (waiting on @matan-starkware)

[dan-starkware]

Reviewed 2 of 2 files at r4, all commit messages.
Reviewable status: all files reviewed, 2 unresolved discussions (waiting on @matan-starkware)

---

crates/sequencing/papyrus_block_builder/src/lib.rs line 55 at r4 (raw file):

            .expect("Failed to read storage")
            .get_block_transactions(block_number)
            .expect("Block missing in storage");

1. Is it guaranteed that the block_number is in storage. If so please add this to the documentation.
2. Try and phrase these messages with should. From option documentation

Code quote:

.expect("Block missing in storage");

---

crates/sequencing/papyrus_consensus/src/lib.rs line 4 at r4 (raw file):

// TODO(Matan): Add a description of the crate.
// TODO(Matan): fix #[allow(missing_docs)].
//! A consensus implementation for a [`Starknet`] node.

Consider adding instead
//! [`Starknet`]: https://starknet.io/

Code quote:

A consensus implementation for a [`Starknet`] node.

[dan-starkware]

Reviewed 2 of 2 files at r5, all commit messages.
Reviewable status: all files reviewed, 1 unresolved discussion (waiting on @matan-starkware)

[matan-starkware]

Reviewable status: complete! all files reviewed, all discussions resolved (waiting on @matan-starkware)

---

crates/sequencing/papyrus_consensus/src/lib.rs line 4 at r4 (raw file):

Previously, dan-starkware wrote…

Consider adding instead
//! [`Starknet`]: https://starknet.io/

Done.