-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 592
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Switch 'Ice/optional' Tests to use Optional Structs Instead of Optional Classes #2094
Merged
InsertCreativityHere
merged 6 commits into
zeroc-ice:main
from
InsertCreativityHere:remove-optional-classes-3
May 1, 2024
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
6 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
7d3c7c1
Switch some tests to use optional structs instead of optional classes.
InsertCreativityHere 9947059
First round of fixes to other languages
InsertCreativityHere 356a13e
Hopefully the last of them.
InsertCreativityHere 11ae20f
Remove send/return optional test functions.
InsertCreativityHere 1468b4c
We were reusing a variable later on in a test...
InsertCreativityHere 8725b8d
More variable re-use.
InsertCreativityHere File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
G1/G2 and G are apparently used for opG below. It's not clear to me what is special with this test, especially now that G1 and G2 are plain structs.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
All of these
G
types are for testing the combination of optionals andmarshaled-result
:We have a 4 marshaled-result tests in total.
The first uses optional structs (which hold a single required byte),
the second uses an optional sequence, the third uses an optional dictionary.
But none of these test marshaled-result with optional members.
Hence, I kept the 4th test, since, that's what it tests. A class which holds a combination of optional and required data members. And this test doesn't seem class specific. All we need is a class which holds some optional things internally.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Now, maybe we could remove
opG()
.It seems we added it as part of a bug-fix:
Fixed ICE-6602: optionals marshaling bug
, so to play it safe I kept it.I couldn't find any more detailed explanation in the logs, and forgot how to log into JIRA.