Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[systems] Clarify doc that AllocateContext is a trap #22479

Conversation

jwnimmer-tri
Copy link
Collaborator

@jwnimmer-tri jwnimmer-tri commented Jan 17, 2025

Closes #17649.

+@sherm1 for both reviews, please!


This change is Reviewable

@jwnimmer-tri jwnimmer-tri added priority: low status: single reviewer ok https://drake.mit.edu/reviewable.html release notes: none This pull request should not be mentioned in the release notes labels Jan 17, 2025
Copy link
Member

@sherm1 sherm1 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

:lgtm_strong: x 2

Reviewed 1 of 1 files at r1, all commit messages.
Reviewable status: :shipit: complete! all discussions resolved, LGTM from assignee sherm1(platform)

@jwnimmer-tri jwnimmer-tri merged commit 02bbf73 into RobotLocomotion:master Jan 17, 2025
10 checks passed
@jwnimmer-tri jwnimmer-tri deleted the allocate-context-here-be-dragons branch January 17, 2025 01:39
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
priority: low release notes: none This pull request should not be mentioned in the release notes status: single reviewer ok https://drake.mit.edu/reviewable.html
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

particles example doesn't visualize because it incorrectly uses AllocateContext
2 participants