[ENH] Add auto information

[vferat]

Adapt code from https://github.com/Frederic-vW/AIF-PAIF as discussed in this issue and by emails.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #112 (777f0c5) into main (2562921) will decrease coverage by 1.21%.
Report is 7 commits behind head on main.
The diff coverage is 92.04%.

❗ Current head 777f0c5 differs from pull request most recent head 24b7462. Consider uploading reports for the commit 24b7462 to get more accurate results

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #112      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   90.93%   89.73%   -1.21%     
==========================================
  Files          30       33       +3     
  Lines        2615     2923     +308     
  Branches      501      562      +61     
==========================================
+ Hits         2378     2623     +245     
- Misses        136      179      +43     
- Partials      101      121      +20     

Files	Coverage Δ
pycrostates/_typing.py	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
pycrostates/cluster/aahc.py	97.79% <100.00%> (ø)
pycrostates/cluster/kmeans.py	96.66% <100.00%> (ø)
pycrostates/cluster/utils/utils.py	85.71% <ø> (ø)
pycrostates/datasets/lemon/lemon.py	92.85% <ø> (ø)
pycrostates/io/ch_data.py	91.78% <100.00%> (-2.51%)	⬇️
pycrostates/io/fiff.py	75.57% <100.00%> (-2.24%)	⬇️
pycrostates/io/meas_info.py	81.39% <100.00%> (-3.32%)	⬇️
pycrostates/io/reader.py	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
pycrostates/metrics/calinski_harabasz.py	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
... and 18 more

... and 4 files with indirect coverage changes

[vferat]

Here, I reuse the parameter ignore_self introduced in the #91. I find that the name isn't very explicit, especially outside the context of transition probabilities ( "transition to itself"). I think it would be good to have a generic and explicit name that would indicate when an analysis considers segmentation with state repetition (AABBBC) or without (ABC).

@mscheltienne do you think it's a big problem to change the variable name (for backwards compatibility) ? Maybe we could introduce it as an alias for the transition module.
Also, do you have any suggestion for a more explicit name ? ignore_repeated_states, ignore_repeation?

[mscheltienne]

I took care of the conflicts and removed the deprecation from this PR.

[vferat]

@mscheltienne ready for review !

[mscheltienne]

LGTM, couple style improvements and I've sneak in new make files for the documentation build with additional options and fixed the dead changelog links that we did not notice previously.