Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Move deployment related config to protocol-deployments #339

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Nov 14, 2023

Conversation

oveddan
Copy link
Collaborator

@oveddan oveddan commented Nov 9, 2023

If we choose to pin protocol-deployments to a specific version of 1155, it imports it via npm and doesnt symlink, thus losing the test folder, and we get an error its looking for fixtures in the test folder of 1155. This moves all Deployment related code to the protocol-deployments package, thus removing that link.

See this in action in the downstream PR #340 where we can pin protocol-deployments to a specific version of 1155-contracts - 2.4.0

This was referenced Nov 9, 2023
@oveddan oveddan force-pushed the move-deployment-utils-to-protocol-deployments branch from 526aee9 to 5d86660 Compare November 9, 2023 21:14
@oveddan oveddan mentioned this pull request Nov 9, 2023
@oveddan oveddan changed the base branch from cache-src to main November 10, 2023 00:14
@oveddan oveddan force-pushed the move-deployment-utils-to-protocol-deployments branch from 5d86660 to 0a49450 Compare November 10, 2023 00:14
@oveddan oveddan changed the base branch from main to remove-supply-royalty-deprecation-test November 10, 2023 01:30
@oveddan oveddan force-pushed the move-deployment-utils-to-protocol-deployments branch from 0a49450 to a50ae1c Compare November 10, 2023 01:30
@oveddan oveddan changed the base branch from remove-supply-royalty-deprecation-test to main November 13, 2023 20:09
@oveddan oveddan force-pushed the move-deployment-utils-to-protocol-deployments branch from c5b24e9 to 766037e Compare November 13, 2023 23:22
@oveddan oveddan merged commit 293e2c0 into main Nov 14, 2023
10 checks passed
@oveddan
Copy link
Collaborator Author

oveddan commented Nov 14, 2023

Merge activity

iainnash pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 5, 2024
If we choose to pin protocol-deployments to a specific version of 1155, it imports it via npm and doesnt symlink, thus losing the `test` folder, and we get an error its looking for fixtures in the `test` folder of 1155.  This moves all Deployment related code to the `protocol-deployments` package, thus removing that link.

See this in action in the downstream PR #340 where we can pin `protocol-deployments` to a specific version of `1155-contracts` - 2.4.0
iainnash pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 11, 2024
If we choose to pin protocol-deployments to a specific version of 1155, it imports it via npm and doesnt symlink, thus losing the `test` folder, and we get an error its looking for fixtures in the `test` folder of 1155.  This moves all Deployment related code to the `protocol-deployments` package, thus removing that link.

See this in action in the downstream PR #340 where we can pin `protocol-deployments` to a specific version of `1155-contracts` - 2.4.0
iainnash pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 11, 2024
If we choose to pin protocol-deployments to a specific version of 1155, it imports it via npm and doesnt symlink, thus losing the `test` folder, and we get an error its looking for fixtures in the `test` folder of 1155.  This moves all Deployment related code to the `protocol-deployments` package, thus removing that link.

See this in action in the downstream PR #340 where we can pin `protocol-deployments` to a specific version of `1155-contracts` - 2.4.0
@iainnash iainnash deleted the move-deployment-utils-to-protocol-deployments branch January 11, 2024 15:36
oveddan added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 9, 2024
<!--- Provide a general summary of your changes in the Title above -->

## Description

This updates the changelog to show how rewards splits were changed to be calculated based on %

## Motivation and Context

<!--- Why is this change required? What problem does it solve? -->
<!--- If it fixes an open issue, please link to the issue here. -->

## Does this change the ABI/API?

- [ ] This changes the ABI/API

<!-- If so, please describe how and what potential impact this may have -->

## What tests did you add/modify to account for these changes

<!--- Please describe in detail how you tested your changes. -->
<!--- Include details of your testing environment, tests ran to see how -->
<!--- your change affects other areas of the code, etc. -->

## Types of changes

<!--- What types of changes does your code introduce? Put an `x` in all the boxes that apply: -->

- [ ] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
- [ ] New module / feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
- [ ] Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)

## Checklist:

<!--- Go over all the following points, and put an `x` in all the boxes that apply. -->
<!--- If you're unsure about any of these, don't hesitate to ask. We're here to help! -->

- [ ] My code follows the code style of this project.
- [ ] My change requires a change to the documentation.
- [ ] I have updated the documentation accordingly.
- [ ] i added a changeset to account for this change

## Reviewer Checklist:

- [ ] My review includes a symposis of the changes and potential issues
- [ ] The code style is enforced
- [ ] There are no risky / concerning changes / additions to the PR
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants